This Article Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 0305829809335839v1 38/1/137    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Osiander, A. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Culture, Change and the Meaning of History: Reflections on Richard Lebow's New Theory of International Relations

Humboldt-Universität, Berlin

In my critique of Richard Lebow's new A Cultural Theory of International Relations I highlight a lack of sensitivity to the problem of structural change. Contrary to Lebow's claim to be more attuned to change than existing IR theory, I contend that his exclusive focus on the recurrence of certain behavioural patterns in the course of history is insufficient as a foundation for a new grand theory. Interesting as it may be, this focus is restrictive even with regard to the concept of culture on which it is based. Thus, religion and ideology, which surely must be classified as cultural phenomena, are virtually ignored. Last but not least, I fault the book for its cavalier, indeed often cartoonish, treatment of the historical record. The book falls far short of the `sympathetic reliving' of the past that it promises; the argument is, moreover, seriously impaired by the myriad factual mistakes that the book contains.

Key Words: culture • grand theory in IR • statehood • structural change • western history

This version was published on August 1, 2009

Millennium - Journal of International Studies, Vol. 38, No. 1, 137-152 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0305829809335839


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?